Karnataka High Court Quashes 2% Cinema Cess Notices, Relief for Exhibitors
Karnataka HC quashes notices mandating a 2% cess on cinema tickets, holding the levy lacked jurisdiction since the 2024 welfare Act was not notified.
The Karnataka High Court has quashed notices that had required cinema exhibitors to collect and remit a 2% cess on movie tickets, in a ruling delivered on September 10, 2026. The order brings relief to multiplex operators and, by extension, to audiences who would have borne the added cost.
The petition was filed by the Multiplex Association of India (MAI), PVR INOX and other stakeholders in the exhibition sector. They challenged the notices on the ground that the levy had no legal foundation.
The Court accepted that argument, observing that the Karnataka Cine and Cultural Workers (Welfare) Act, 2024, under which the cess was to be imposed, had not been formally notified. Without that notification, the bench held, the notices directing exhibitors to collect and remit the amount were issued without jurisdiction, and were therefore quashed.
The verdict follows a related administrative step: the State Government had already withdrawn its office order dated August 29, 2026, which dealt with the same cess.
The dispute grew out of MAI's objections to the proposed levy. The association had argued that an additional cess would raise the cost of going to the movies, potentially deterring audiences at a time when the exhibition business is already under strain. It had also contended that such a levy ran counter to efforts to simplify the indirect tax structure for the entertainment sector.
With the notices struck down, attention turns to the future of welfare mechanisms meant to support cultural workers in Karnataka, and whether other frameworks will be explored to meet that goal without adding to ticket prices. MAI has said it is open to facilitating discussions with its representatives on the matter, covering the implications of the ruling for exhibitors and consumers, industry concerns over taxation and affordability, possible alternative routes for worker welfare initiatives, and the road ahead for cinema exhibition in the state.