Punjab Bungalow Row: Khaira-Bishnoi Clash Widens Into AAP Accommodation Debate
A spat between Congress MLA Sukhpal Singh Khaira and AAP leader Gayatri Bishnoi over a Chandigarh government residence has grown into a wider row over Punjab bungalow allotments.
A dispute between Congress MLA Sukhpal Singh Khaira and Aam Aadmi Party leader Gayatri Bishnoi over a government residence in Chandigarh has expanded into a broader political argument about how Punjab's official bungalows are allotted and occupied.
The row began after Khaira raised questions about Bishnoi's presence at a government house in Sector 39, alleging that AAP leaders were occupying accommodation meant for Punjab ministers and officials. In a post on X, he asked her to clarify whether the house she acknowledged staying in, the official residence of Health Minister Dr Balbir Singh, was connected by a small gate to the adjoining property linked to Manish Sisodia.
Bishnoi responded that she was staying with her parents at the Health Minister's residence because her father was undergoing treatment. She objected to the MLA's remarks and accused him of making personal allegations.
The matter did not stay between the two leaders. Shiromani Akali Dal leader Bikram Singh Majithia questioned Bishnoi's explanation and raised issues about who the occupants are and who pays the electricity and water bills. He also asked whether similar facilities are extended to ordinary Punjab residents who travel to Chandigarh for medical care. These remain political allegations that would require verification against official records.
The focus has since shifted to the accommodation system itself: to whom these houses are officially allotted, who actually lives in them, and under what rules someone other than the allottee may stay there.
Punjab Congress Committee chief Amarinder Singh Raja Warring has demanded that allegedly unauthorised occupants be removed from ministerial houses and that penal rent be recovered wherever government accommodation rules are found to have been violated. He has also raised questions about several government houses in Sector 39, alleging that some are occupied or used by AAP leaders, associates or people from outside Punjab. These claims too would need to be checked against allotment and occupation records.
The controversy has gained another dimension after recent Enforcement Directorate action in the Greater Mohali Area Development Authority matter. House No. 926 in Sector 39 has featured in allegations about its reported use by AAP's former Delhi minister.
Separately, Congress leader and advocate Gurpratap Singh Gill has sought an independent inquiry into the allotment and occupation of government residences. His complaint specifically asks for verification of Houses No. 926, 960 and 961, and calls for examination of allotment files, occupancy records, security registers, CCTV footage and visitor records. He has also sought recovery of market or penal rent if unauthorised occupation is established.
With this, the political controversy has moved towards an administrative accountability question. For the Bhagwant Mann government, the immediate test is whether it can provide a clear house-wise account of official allottees, actual occupants, permissions granted and rent paid. For the opposition, the bungalow row has become another means of questioning the functioning of the AAP government and the party's influence in Punjab.
What began as a face-off between Khaira and Bishnoi has thus turned into a wider debate over government property, VIP accommodation and accountability, with the central question being who occupies Punjab's government bungalows, on whose authority, and whether the rules are being followed.