IndiaFocal.

India, in focus.

National

Representative image · Photo: im.rediff.com
Representative image · Photo: im.rediff.com

Saharanpur mosque razed in pre-dawn drive; old well found in rubble

A mosque in the Saharanpur collectorate compound was demolished on September 5, 2026, days after a court dismissed the committee's appeal. An old well was later found in the rubble.

A mosque that its management committee says stood inside the Saharanpur collectorate compound for roughly 150 years was pulled down before dawn on September 5, 2026, with six earth-movers working under a security cordon that included Rapid Action Force personnel and police drawn from neighbouring districts.

How the dispute began

The matter dates to February 2025, when Vikas Tyagi, a Bajrang Dal leader, complained to the district magistrate that the mosque occupied government land illegally. He alleged that its caretakers were renting out rooms in the complex, including to a sub-post office, without any right to do so. The complaint became a formal petition under the Public Premises Act before the city magistrate's court in March 2025.

Competing claims in court

Led by Mohammad Tanvir Ahmed, the mosque committee told the court that the structure had existed at the site for about 150 years, predating the collectorate complex, and that the land's original owners, Yaqub Khan and Wahid Khan, had dedicated it as waqf property for worshippers. The administration countered that the land had been earmarked for a rest house for visitors to the collectorate and was later used for a mosque without authorisation.

In a judgment dated July 16, 2026, the magistrate held that the committee had not established ownership and that the land belonged to the Uttar Pradesh government. The court found that 315 square metres of government land had been illegally occupied and a mosque built on it without lawful authority, making the structure liable to eviction. It also ordered compensation calculated from Fasli year 1359, corresponding to 1952, after the abolition of the zamindari system. Using a minimum circle rate of ₹58,200 per square metre and 70 years of alleged illegal occupation, the amount came to about ₹6.41 crore. The management was given 30 days to vacate.

The committee appealed to the district court, which heard the matter over several hearings before dismissing it on September 2. Its lawyer said there was little time to move the High Court; within about 48 hours of the order, the mosque was brought down.

Political reactions

Samajwadi Party chief Akhilesh Yadav accused the Yogi Adityanath government of using the demolition as a distraction from its record on jobs, inflation and unemployment. He asked why the State could not wait for the matter to reach the High Court or Supreme Court, called the action a "well-planned conspiracy," and said it had damaged India's image as a secular State.

AIMIM chief Asaduddin Owaisi questioned the timing of the operation at 5 a.m. and asked what the hurry was. He also asked whether the constitutional right to religious freedom still held meaning for Muslims in India, describing the demolition as part of a pattern of mosques being knocked down on grounds he called thin and manufactured.

The Congress said it would send a fact-finding team to Saharanpur and termed the episode unfortunate. The State government has maintained that the action concerned an illegal structure on government land and was not about religion.

Legal battle shifts to High Court

The Allahabad High Court on Friday, September 11, stayed the recovery of the penalty imposed on the mosque management and sought the Uttar Pradesh government's response to the petition challenging the action. The next hearing is set for October 12.

A well beneath the rubble

As workers cleared the debris, a structure was found buried about 20 feet below the surface: an old well built with thin lakhori bricks, a type commonly seen in much older constructions. The find is significant because Mr. Tyagi had alleged in his original application that a temple may have stood at the site before the mosque. As in the Gyanvapi and Mathura disputes, the administration has now involved archaeologists, who are studying the brickwork, mortar and soil layers to establish the well's age and original purpose.